home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: ra.nrl.navy.mil!usenet
- From: pitre@n5160d.nrl.navy.mil (Richard Pitre)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: works in Borland but not in Microsuck Visual C++
- Date: 15 Mar 1996 16:01:30 GMT
- Organization: Naval Research Laboratory
- Message-ID: <4ic48q$51k@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
- References: <4ibuke$hui@ralph.vnet.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: n5160d.nrl.navy.mil
-
- In article <4ibuke$hui@ralph.vnet.net> mauricej@vnet.net (Maurice Jeter)
- writes:
- > In article <4ia6h8$jes@news.vanderbilt.edu>,
- > haseltbt@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu says...
- >
- > > The following program was written in completely standard
- > C++
- > >and should be portable across platforms. However, it only performs as
- > >expected (i.e. sends two copies of 4 to the standard out stream) in
- > Borland
- > >C++; when compiled in MicroSUCK Visual C++, it outputs 4 followed by a
- > random
- > >integer in the thousands.
- >
- > Check out the Visual C KB for any issues regarding this; Jump over to
- > Microsoft's Home Page and go to the Support page (I don't remember what
- > its called).
- >
- > I moved from BC to VC 4; a lot of my code would not compile due to
- > different function names and parameters, and very strict type checking,
- > but once I got everything modified I was very please with it.
- > Unfortunately it doesn't seem to catch as many potential errors that BC
- > can
-
- get this
-
- > (such as "code has no effect").
-
- thats because some people, who shall remain nameless, need this "feature".
-
- >
- > ---
- > Maurice Jeter (maurice@msn.com)
- > CIS: 72622,3606 MSN: Maurice
- > http://www.vnet.net/users/maurice
-